Post-Media Journalism? In the Information Age, We Are All Journalists
Posted by Jacqueline on September 27, 2007
Yesterday, Jeff Jarvis (of Buzz Machine) wrote about a new term used to describe the current media climate: post-media journalism. Instead of the over-used phrase “social media” (which has really grown meaningless, thanks to the fact that it is used to describe everything from Flickr to blogging), post-media journalism does do a fairly decent job of encapsulating the fact that the current state of the media is definitely in flux.
However, does the use of the word “post” also imply the end of traditional journalism? Clearly, traditional media is not going roll over and die any time soon, if ever, but no one can deny that both the online and print media spheres are struggling to establish how they can interact with each other, and with the rest of the world. Thanks to the net, the line between reader and producer is irrevocably blurred; and of course, it is becoming easier to create your own content, your own channel, your own lifestream every day. Due to the growth of the web and the advent of the Information Age, every person with an internet connection and something to say can be a journalist.
In this new climate, “the media doesn’t matter now. The conversation does. The connections do”, says Jeff. And it is true – if a blogger or an amateur photographer has something important to say, or writes something that resonates with people, their work is going to get page-views and just make an impact regardless of their credentials. Just look at my previous post about the situation in Myanmar – I’m pretty sure none of those people work for an accredited media source, but I don’t think anyone is discounting their efforts. It’s the people on the front lines of the news, with their ears to the ground and their cameras poised to capture history, that are the real breaking news.
Perhaps the reason the phrase post-media journalism works here is the media is no longer the arbiter of the news. Instead of sitting passively and digesting the news that big journalism feeds to us in the form of newspapers, television, and radio, we’re going online and looking for the information we want (yes, people could write letters to the editor and such, but it has never been so easy to comment and respond to stories). We can even tailor the type and flow of information we receive with RSS.
The future belongs to the people and companies who can figure out how to combine the positive aspects of traditional journalism with the citizen reporting and anything-goes atmosphere on the web. When someone builds a community (and therefore an audience) for their ideas, a place where people can interact and find the information they want easily (important word there – yes, we all know that whatever info we’re seeking is out there, but it’s definitely not always simple to locate or packaged nicely), that is the new media.
The information is out there – journalists (the old school media types and the citizen bloggers armed with video cameras and laptops) are the ones who need to get it in front of our eyeballs by whatever means they have available. And of course, if you happen to have an idea that relates to how journalists of all stripes can share and package their work, you should be checking out the Knight News Challenge.
This entry was posted on September 27, 2007 at 2:03 am and is filed under Blogging, Digital Media, General, Innovation, Journalism, New Media, Technology. Tagged: Blogging, Digital Media, Journalism, New Media, social media, Technology, Web, web 2.0. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.